<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contact microphones (&amp; attachement methods) shootout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soundmindfx.com/2014/10/contact-microphones-attachement-methods-shootout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soundmindfx.com/2014/10/contact-microphones-attachement-methods-shootout/</link>
	<description>sound mind michal fojcik</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:38:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://soundmindfx.com/2014/10/contact-microphones-attachement-methods-shootout/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soundmindfx.com/?p=2958#comment-1070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, Barcus Berrys has wider frequency range - deeper lows and good highs. Today one of my JrFs was rolled over by bowling ball, but surprisingly it survived. I agree, it&#039;s always a bit risky to press them hard while attaching. Second Barcus Berry is on my wishlist...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Barcus Berrys has wider frequency range &#8211; deeper lows and good highs. Today one of my JrFs was rolled over by bowling ball, but surprisingly it survived. I agree, it&#8217;s always a bit risky to press them hard while attaching. Second Barcus Berry is on my wishlist&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://soundmindfx.com/2014/10/contact-microphones-attachement-methods-shootout/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soundmindfx.com/?p=2958#comment-1064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do the barcus berry ones have much more low end and a over all better frequency response ? I think they have also a better high end in my opinion. I&#039;m looking for new c-mics. I own the jrf ones and i like the sound but they&#039;re too fragile. I killed 4 of them in the last months only be attaching them with a clamp to different objects. Somehow it gets a bit expensive to by new ones after every record session :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the barcus berry ones have much more low end and a over all better frequency response ? I think they have also a better high end in my opinion. I&#8217;m looking for new c-mics. I own the jrf ones and i like the sound but they&#8217;re too fragile. I killed 4 of them in the last months only be attaching them with a clamp to different objects. Somehow it gets a bit expensive to by new ones after every record session <img src="http://soundmindfx.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif" alt=":(" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
